.
Feedback

GIRLS BASKETBALL: St. Mary's Downs Notre Dame

Visiting Tigers suffer season-ending defeat to tall & athletic opponent in NorCal Division IV semis; Notre Dame seniors pleased with historic postseason showing.

The Score: St. Mary’s 60, Notre Dame 39.

The Star: Notre Dame High senior point guard Janet Brazil did an admirable job of directing her team’s offense against a formidable St. Mary’s defense in the California Interscholastic Federation Division IV playoffs. The three-year player scored a team-high nine points in the Northern California semifinal and kept the visiting Tigers as in sync as possible despite being guarded by a quick 6-footer in Gabby Green in Berkeley on Saturday night.

The Turning Point: Notre Dame (15-15) stayed within range of a plausible comeback against the defending NorCal champions into the second half, pulling within seven points when Gianna Bertana banked in a 3-pointer early in the third quarter. But in a sequence midway through the period, the Tigers committed turnovers on three straight possessions. St. Mary’s (29-4) capitalized to take a commanding 43-26 lead on a Jade Rowland 3-pointer with 1:53 remaining in the quarter.

The Quote: “I’m really proud. First of all, we won CCS. That’s a huge deal for our team. I’m going to look back on that forever, come back to the Notre Dame gym and look up and see the banner. That’s what I’m going to remember from this season. I’m just going to remember my teammates and be proud of everything we’ve accomplished.” – Notre Dame four-year player Emily Morris, on her emotions following her team’s breakthrough season.

The Quote #2: "The kids overachieved all year long, and that’s something I’ll be proud of as long as I coach at Notre Dame. This was a great year for the Notre Dame Tigers. All the dedication and hard work they’ve put in was finally rewarded. They competed their guts out.” – Tigers third-year coach Josh Davenport, on what he will remember of his 2010-11 team.

What’s Next? Notre Dame’s season is finished.

The Bottom Line: The Tigers’ historic season came to an expected end against an elite opponent. … In the previous eight days, Notre Dame won – and third overall – and claimed in blowout fashion. But in St. Mary’s of Berkeley, the Tigers were undone by a team with height and athleticism up and down its roster. … Notre Dame impressively set the pace in the first quarter, clearly frustrating St. Mary’s into missing its first nine shots to take a 7-3 lead over the defending NorCal champs at the end of the period. But even then, St. Mary’s showed its ability on the defensive end, as four players combined to block six shots in the opening quarter. … St. Mary’s, No. 8 in the state (and No. 1 in Division IV) according to CalHiSports, overcame its early turnover woes and started to control its fast break in the second quarter – and began to assert itself by making 10-of-20 shots in the period. … Notre Dame’s Katie Flaherty kept her team within 27-17 at the break by drilling a 3-pointer at the buzzer – continuing the accuracy from long distance that has surprised her. “I’ve never been a 3-point shooter in my life,” said the senior forward, whose two late 3-pointers powered the Tigers to the CCS title-game victory over Scotts Valley. “Freshman, sophomore, junior year, I’d never been a 3-point shooter. … In the summer, I made one and I said, ‘That’s it for me.’ (But) in the postseason, I’ve just been shooting them more. And thank God they’ve been going in.” … Notre Dame committed 17 turnovers to St. Mary’s five in the final three quarters. “We have a lot of long, athletic girls,” St. Mary’s coach Nathan Fripp explained. “We try to take players out of what they want to do offensively. The game starts to speed up – that’s what we want to do.” … St. Mary’s freshman guard Gabby Green was a ball-hawk atop her team’s defense. Green is listed at 5-foot-11, but … “She’s not really,” said a smiling Fripp. “She’s taller than that.” … The Panthers, who advanced to the NorCal final for the third straight year, blocked 10 shots, including five by reserve Mikayla Cowling. … St. Mary’s, which started three players 6-foot or taller, enjoyed a huge rebounding advantage at both ends, which helped the hosts attempt 17 more field goals (and 11 more free throws) than Notre Dame. … Asked to compare St. Mary’s to other top teams, Davenport said: “Mitty and Presentation have a lot of length this year, but this team was a lot more athletic and quicker than those teams.” … Morris on the unusual defensive style the Tigers faced on Saturday: “In the WCAL, I think defense is really more controlled. (St. Mary’s is) willing to gamble to block shots. And it works for them.” … Morris (U.C. San Diego) faced a team with three college-bound seniors: April Bernal (Navy), Emily Vann (U.C. Davis) and Cody Sims (Fordham). … Bernal scored all of her game-high 16 points in the second and third quarters as St. Mary’s took control. … “Their defense is tight,” Flaherty said. “Usually, there’s always one short girl. (But) every single one of them was really good. Even their bench players came in and scored.” … Morris on her team’s unprecedented postseason run: “I’m really proud of us because the farthest I’d ever gone was the CCS semifinals. So I got to play for an extra two weeks.”

________________________________________________________________

St. Mary’s 60, Notre Dame 39

ND – 7 10 11 11 – 39

SM – 5 22 20 13 -- 60

ND: Brazil 3 2-2 9, Bertana 2 0-0 5, Dames 0 2-2 2, Flaherty 2 1-2 6, Morris 4 0-2 8, Soderer 1 1-2 3, White 2 0-0 6. Totals: 14 6-10 39.

SM: Bernal 6 3-3 16, Vann 2 1-4 5, Sims 0 5-6 5, Green 4 0-0 8, Mauldin 5 0-4 10, Cowling 3 0-0 6, Rowland 2 0-0 6, Smull 0 4-4 4. Totals: 22 13-21 60.

3-point goals: ND: White 2, Brazil, Bertana, Flaherty. SM: Rowland 2, Bernal.

Records: Notre Dame 15-15. St. Mary’s 29-4.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
DJ May 20, 2013 at 05:51 am
Please come to the San Mateo City Council meeting tonight at 7:00 or shortly after and voice yourRead More concern about replacing our community's skating rink with a retail store. Bring something to read/do while we wait for our turn to speak. City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 dina.artzt@comcast.net if you are interested in updates on our cause.
CP May 15, 2013 at 10:05 am
The City has spent time working with the developer, behind closed doors it would seem, yet inputRead More from the public was an afterthought due to MANY families showing up at a May 6 City Council Meeting (not on the Agenda, yet rink to close June 1 !) So many kids spoke so sincerely and eloquently how the closure would hurt them and their friends. Does San Mateo City Hall care about the residents of our community? Especially the children. City Hall has the upper hand (the Master Plan agreement), we expect them to step up. Why has City Hall allowed SPI to make the children of our community suffer so much agony and pain over this process? Shame on City Hall for letting this drag out !!
CP May 13, 2013 at 02:30 am
Don't give up....the kids are worth it! It is wrong for SPI to be in non-compliance with the masterRead More plan. City Hall should be filing some type of injunction to stop closure of the ice center....this is not right. Repeat of what happened with 7 Eleven on North San Mateo Drive when the developer ignored our City ordinances/plans. Why is this happening again in our City of San Mateo?
Joc C May 14, 2013 at 06:49 pm
Parents supporting Redwood Shores Schools for Redwood Shores Kids, very well said. You have my fullRead More support.
Pearl April 29, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Thanks for sharing, Ari!!!! It's been my experience that when you volunteer, you get back way moreRead More than you give! Thanks for the great example you are setting for us all.
Kelly O'Dea April 29, 2013 at 06:23 pm
Ari-Thanks for sharing the adventures of your volunteering projects! You are a great inspiration toRead More our entire community and we are all very proud to have you as a spokesperson on how volunteering can make a huge impact! Thank you very much! Keep on having fun!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 29, 2013 at 04:13 pm
This is a great reminder that any other local volunteers who would like to share their projects withRead More the community may do so on Belmont Patch! Simply email the editor at joan.dentler@patch.com. Great job Ari!
KP May 2, 2013 at 09:43 pm
Again, thank you Brian for this great article about Nesbit. I'm unsure of how it turned into aRead More sounding board for the petulant to vent but those of us who know how wonderful Nesbit is sure appreciate your article.
Joc C May 2, 2013 at 09:30 pm
API of 800 is not bad but parents are comparing it with other schools in the district. There areRead More other issues that make parents unhappy. The residents in RWS and Belmont Shores are paying property tax which contributes to the building of RWSE. There is an expectation that their kids will go to the kids they help fund. The RWS parents are unhappy because they were told they would not be affected by the no boundary policy. Then, a year later 26 families are affected. No one like surprises. The board's decision to use a 'walking distance' algorithm to promote neighborhood schools is not working. Well, hypothetically if Nesbit API is over 900 and the other schools has API of 800, would we still have this discussion? We would not know for sure but something to think about if API is a factor among others.
Brannigan May 2, 2013 at 08:40 pm
I just moved into the neighborhood behind Iron Gate and we bought in Belmont because of the schools.Read More I am kinda shocked to find people bashing Nesbit. The API score is over 800, has great diversity, and the location seems to be pretty convenient. Our son has 2 more years before he starts, but we wouldn't mind one bit if we ended up at Nesbit. What's the difference of 100 points on API that an extra 5 minutes of father-son tutoring time can't fix. Besides, we all end up at Ralston and Carlmont anyways. To me, those are the schools that matter most.
Karen Haas-Foletta May 6, 2013 at 03:32 pm
We have an on-site after care program at Ralson Middle School. Middle School youth are not too oldRead More to be in aftercare. The youth have a chance to exercise, eat a healthy snack, get their homework done, do arts and crafts, be with their friends and most importantly be in a safe, secure and educational environment. We have around 35 youth enrolled on Wednesdays and room for more if anyone is interested. The program is called Footsteps@RAMS.
Joe May 2, 2013 at 11:19 pm
You have to love the Patch, there is always someone complaining about public education. The schoolsRead More really must have failed all of you, because you don't know how to Google anything to educate yourself before you spew your negative opinions. Below are a couple of links that will help you learn. The first informs you of what minimum days are actually for and the second tells you legally why all schools in the county either have them or have shorter school years. For those of you that aren't the best readers or researchers I'll just tell you that BRSSD adheres to the required instructional minutes in the state. In fact, it is actually over in some grade levels. If you don't feel like believing the information I provided or don't like BRSSD's policy I've also linked the District's website so you can contact the administration or the board members. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-minimum-day.htm#did-you-know http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/au/ag/reducingit.asp http://www.brssd.org
Old Timer May 1, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Was nice when children actually did chores and became responsible young adults with a part time jobRead More to manage finances.
Laura Klieves May 8, 2013 at 03:01 am
I'm just now reading this, and haveapizza, I resent that you think that Nesbit parents aren'tRead More involved in their kids' education. I've been involved since my kids started school, and I know many others who are involved too. Oh, and my kids are accountable for their education. Stop bashing Nesbit.
Linda April 29, 2013 at 03:20 am
The current situation is much worse because these are permanent assignments, not just one-yearRead More assignments.
Amy Koo April 29, 2013 at 02:57 am
We will be sharing the latest petition results with the board on May 2nd, so please show yourRead More support by signing if you haven't already. There are only 7 K seats available at Nesbit to handle all of Phase 2 and Phase 3 enrollment. Rather delaying the decision, the board should be proactive and approve the 4th K class at Sandpiper at the May 2nd meeting so that Sandpiper staff can prepare for that additional K class, and parents can move on to collaborating with the district on long term solutions for over-enrollment.
Steve Hayes April 15, 2013 at 03:27 pm
Seems like there is something wrong with this picture - two dogs being way too polite. The focus ofRead More their attention should be on those bones and the bones should be in less than pristine condition!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 15, 2013 at 11:18 am
Good one Ronald!
Ronald Veronda April 14, 2013 at 10:44 pm
Just remember, God is Dog spelled backwards.