.

Transitional Kindergarten Confirmed

The controversial program will move ahead in the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District.

After discussing many , the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District board members unanimously agreed to implement the Transitional Kindergarten (TK) program next year.

Before the voting took place, trustee Charles Velschow wanted to know how nearby school districts voted on TK programs.

"Pretty much everyone has gone yes," said Suzanne Roy, Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services and Personnel.

"So we would be the ones to get sued," Velschow asked his fellow board members. The debate continued as trustee Andrew Stulbarg clarified that the school district could only be sued by a parent over the issue of transitional kindergarten, a scenario he deemed unlikely.

According to Roy the law is clear and transitional kindergarten is non-negotiable. Stulbarg, however, said the law was nebulous and that the estimated cost of the TK program would be put to better use elsewhere.

"It's $81,000 that we need. The law is not truly definitive about whether or not we have to have the program, so I'll be the one to respectfully decent and say I don't think we should," Stulbarg said.

The amount of investment required to run a TK program is a point of contention for California State Sen. Joe Simitian, who authored SB 1381 and . While Simitian maintains that schools simply need to redistribute existing resources, the BRSSD estimates the need for an additional teacher and classroom to support the program.

Twenty children have enrolled in the program since the California Department of Education issued the mandate for TK within SB 1381, also known as The Kindergarten Readiness Act. Transitional kindergarten is designed for children who turn five in October, November or December and are not quite ready for traditional kindergarten (see details below).

In the end, every member of the board voted for the continuation of the transitional kindergarten program, but not before board president Brian Matthews expressed his thoughts. "It is costing us money. They can say that it's not but it is. It's just another unfunded mandate," he said. "But we should also say that it is a quality cirriculum," Matthews added, "so children will be helped."


Specific Cut-Off Dates for Kindergarten as Outlined in SB 1381


A child shall be admitted to a kindergarten maintained by the school district at the beginning of a school year, or at a later time in the same year if the child will have his or her fifth birthday on or before one of the following dates:

For the 2011–12 school year the date is December 2
For the 2012–13 school year the date is November 1
For the 2013–14 school year the date is October 1
For the 2014–15 school year and each school year thereafter the date is September 1.

 

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for us

Jeff Selman June 08, 2012 at 10:26 PM
Absolutely understandable that the Board approved TK for the reasons stated, but as has been discussed in the comments on the prior article regarding the Simitian interview, it is a shame that the Board was put in this position. Mr. Simitian's original bill had two noble purposes -- (a) aligning California with 45 other states in not allowing children to begin elementary school until they are developmentally ready, and (b) very substantial cash savings from the reduction in the number of students in the schools; savings which would have been beneficial when schools and the state are strapped for cash. Unfortunately, Sacramento buckled to the desires of parents whose kids would have had to wait a year before starting school, and amended the bill to enable kids deemed too young to attend kindergarten with an additional year of schooling. By doing so, the legislature defeated both original goals, and we in Belmont Redwood Shores will have to find $81k to cover both existing programs and the new TK (on top of the more than $2 million which needs to be brought in to stop the use of reserve funds to cover state cuts in funding). Going forward, as the PTAs in California hopefully reassert the advocacy function which they have, it would be great if they could lobby the legislature to repeal the mandate and restore the Kindergarten Readiness Act to just that as originally proposed by Mr. Simitian.
Siam P June 14, 2012 at 06:21 AM
This article states that TK would start next year. Is it referring to the 2013/2014 school year or 2012/2013?
Stephen Sexton November 15, 2012 at 03:42 PM
Who's serving who? What about the needs of the children!
anon November 15, 2012 at 10:31 PM
if you are under the impression BRSSD cares about kids, I suggest you trot along to Nesbit school and watch assembly where hundreds of kids are yelled at through a megaphone first thing in the morning...about money.."collect money, we need money, donate money". Well with the costs of pensions and salaries these days whats a school to do?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »