.
Feedback

CHS Lays Out Plan for Field Lights

Neighbors express concern over additional noise and traffic generated by evening sporting events at the high school.

 

In a town hall meeting Thursday evening, officials from the Sequoia Union High School District (SUHD) and (CHS) presented a plan to install field lights and make other enhancements to the CHS athletic stadium facility.

Along with school administrators, staff, project consultants, board members and architects, SUHD superintendent James Lianides gave an overview of the to a full house at the Carlmont Student Union. 

Although Carlmont remains the , and there is much support surrounding the project, some community members who live in nearby neighborhoods expressed concern over the project. Following a PowerPoint presentation outlining the project, the public had an opportunity to address the presenters.

"Has anything been done with San Carlos? We couldn't get out of our driveways in November during a night game, and the P.A. systems are so loud now, how can we be sure it won't get worse?" asked Pam Davis, who lives on San Carlos Avenue. 

Another neighbor asked why the school didn't follow city ordinances with regards to noise and traffic. Superintendent Lianides explained that as a state agency, schools are not subject to local ordinances. 

Several city officials from Belmont attended the meeting, including city councilmembers Coralin Feierbach, Christine Wozniak, and David Braunstein. Braunstein is also a teacher at Carlmont High School.

Also in attendance was San Carlos mayor, and Carlmont High alumnus (Class of 2000), Andy Klein. 

Klein takes the concerns of the residents seriously. "We have a tenuous relationship between the district and the neighbors adjacent to the school, and these are ongoing issues," he said. 

"My staff will continue to work with neighbors, the police department, public works and the planning department to address these issues," Klein added.

In addition to adding four permanent field lights to the stadium, the project also calls for an additional 456-seat aluminum ADA-compliant bleacher on the visitor side of the field, 40 additional parking spaces adjacent to the tennis courts, an electrical upgrade and re-turfing of the synthetic athletic field. 

The high-tech light bulbs atop 80-foot poles, Lianides explained, are designed to illuminate things vertically, thus avoiding "spillage" or light pollution to surrounding areas.

Lianides also spelled out a usage policy for the field, giving evening football games a time limit of 10:30 p.m.; during all other activities, such as special events, sports practices and community youth sports events, the lights will be turned of at 9 p.m. 

"In addition to Friday night football," explained Lianides in his presentation, "there are other benefits to the school: school spirit, connecting students to campus, and evening games give parents an opportunity to attend." 

One of the greatest benefits of extending the sports day by lighting field officials said, would be the ability to accommodate other sports that rely on the stadium for practices and competition. Soccer, lacrosse and track and field also use the stadium, but are limited in winter months by lack of daylight. Currently, practices and competitions must end by 5-5:30 p.m., which often means teams can't finish a game.

Carlmont parent Jeff Adams supports the project, "My son is plays on the frosh-soph soccer team, and our kids are embarrassed when other teams come to Carlmont to play, and they can't finish their game because it gets dark." 

Michele Maia, who has lived on Hastings Drive in Belmont for 25 years also spoke out in favor of the lights. "I've seen changes in this school over the years and they've all been for the better." 

Maia has two children at Carlmont. "My son plays soccer, and he's missing classes because he has to leave school early for games and practices."

Teacher and girls' varsity soccer coach, Tina Doss agrees, "This is a great opportunity for our kids not to have to cut their school day short to get to their game." Doss explained that lights would allow teams to utilize the whole field for longer stretches of time, instead of breaking the field into halves or thirds to share it with another team's practice. 

"I would be able to have more time on the whole field, and I'd be happy to rotate my practice schedule with other coaches." added Doss. "I can practice 5:30-7:30 p.m. now, allowing someone else to use the field from 3:30-5:30. Students can come into my classroom before practice and get their homework done, or ask for help."

With regards to traffic, one of the consultants on the project explained that the results of a study done last fall (when the school had temporary lights brought in for a night game), indicated that there is adequate roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed changes. 

"We will continue to work with the Belmont Police Department to improve traffic flow during these events," Lianides assured the attendees.

But that didn't adequately assuage the concerns of many residents of Cranfield Avenue who spoke out in opposition of the proposal. "This is a significant impact on the quality of life in our neighborhood, and this will effect thousands of people," said one resident. 

Another resident who lives near the school asked what the school would do to mitigate the added traffic, noise, and lights. "We're tax payers too. The school should be a good neighbor," she said. 

School officials noted that a CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) study, which includes a noise analysis, would be made available to the public. Superintendent Lianides agreed to notify the surrounding neighborhoods once the study was available for review. The initial study should be released by mid-February, and the public has 30 days to submit written comments. A downloadable version of the study will be available on the district's website, and a hard copy will be available at the Belmont Library. 

The comments and responses to the study will be incorporated into the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, which will be reviewed by the school district at its May 2 meeting. 

If approved, the athletic field lights, new bleachers and additional parking will be ready for the 2012-13 football season.  Construction will begin this summer and Lianides said the project should take about two months to complete, and there would be no encroachment upon private property or pubic right-of-ways. 

Carlmont High School football player Nick Long, who will be a senior next year, spoke on behalf of his fellow athletes, "Playing under the lights at Carlmont will be a privilege," said Long. "Something you'll remember for the rest of your life."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
CP May 15, 2013 at 10:05 am
The City has spent time working with the developer, behind closed doors it would seem, yet inputRead More from the public was an afterthought due to MANY families showing up at a May 6 City Council Meeting (not on the Agenda, yet rink to close June 1 !) So many kids spoke so sincerely and eloquently how the closure would hurt them and their friends. Does San Mateo City Hall care about the residents of our community? Especially the children. City Hall has the upper hand (the Master Plan agreement), we expect them to step up. Why has City Hall allowed SPI to make the children of our community suffer so much agony and pain over this process? Shame on City Hall for letting this drag out !!
CP May 13, 2013 at 02:30 am
Don't give up....the kids are worth it! It is wrong for SPI to be in non-compliance with the masterRead More plan. City Hall should be filing some type of injunction to stop closure of the ice center....this is not right. Repeat of what happened with 7 Eleven on North San Mateo Drive when the developer ignored our City ordinances/plans. Why is this happening again in our City of San Mateo?
Judi May 11, 2013 at 01:20 pm
Post the link to the City Council email if you can... it always makes it easier for those not usedRead More to communicating with government.
Joc C May 14, 2013 at 06:49 pm
Parents supporting Redwood Shores Schools for Redwood Shores Kids, very well said. You have my fullRead More support.
Pearl April 29, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Thanks for sharing, Ari!!!! It's been my experience that when you volunteer, you get back way moreRead More than you give! Thanks for the great example you are setting for us all.
Kelly O'Dea April 29, 2013 at 06:23 pm
Ari-Thanks for sharing the adventures of your volunteering projects! You are a great inspiration toRead More our entire community and we are all very proud to have you as a spokesperson on how volunteering can make a huge impact! Thank you very much! Keep on having fun!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 29, 2013 at 04:13 pm
This is a great reminder that any other local volunteers who would like to share their projects withRead More the community may do so on Belmont Patch! Simply email the editor at joan.dentler@patch.com. Great job Ari!
KP May 2, 2013 at 09:43 pm
Again, thank you Brian for this great article about Nesbit. I'm unsure of how it turned into aRead More sounding board for the petulant to vent but those of us who know how wonderful Nesbit is sure appreciate your article.
Joc C May 2, 2013 at 09:30 pm
API of 800 is not bad but parents are comparing it with other schools in the district. There areRead More other issues that make parents unhappy. The residents in RWS and Belmont Shores are paying property tax which contributes to the building of RWSE. There is an expectation that their kids will go to the kids they help fund. The RWS parents are unhappy because they were told they would not be affected by the no boundary policy. Then, a year later 26 families are affected. No one like surprises. The board's decision to use a 'walking distance' algorithm to promote neighborhood schools is not working. Well, hypothetically if Nesbit API is over 900 and the other schools has API of 800, would we still have this discussion? We would not know for sure but something to think about if API is a factor among others.
Brannigan May 2, 2013 at 08:40 pm
I just moved into the neighborhood behind Iron Gate and we bought in Belmont because of the schools.Read More I am kinda shocked to find people bashing Nesbit. The API score is over 800, has great diversity, and the location seems to be pretty convenient. Our son has 2 more years before he starts, but we wouldn't mind one bit if we ended up at Nesbit. What's the difference of 100 points on API that an extra 5 minutes of father-son tutoring time can't fix. Besides, we all end up at Ralston and Carlmont anyways. To me, those are the schools that matter most.
Karen Haas-Foletta May 6, 2013 at 03:32 pm
We have an on-site after care program at Ralson Middle School. Middle School youth are not too oldRead More to be in aftercare. The youth have a chance to exercise, eat a healthy snack, get their homework done, do arts and crafts, be with their friends and most importantly be in a safe, secure and educational environment. We have around 35 youth enrolled on Wednesdays and room for more if anyone is interested. The program is called Footsteps@RAMS.
Joe May 2, 2013 at 11:19 pm
You have to love the Patch, there is always someone complaining about public education. The schoolsRead More really must have failed all of you, because you don't know how to Google anything to educate yourself before you spew your negative opinions. Below are a couple of links that will help you learn. The first informs you of what minimum days are actually for and the second tells you legally why all schools in the county either have them or have shorter school years. For those of you that aren't the best readers or researchers I'll just tell you that BRSSD adheres to the required instructional minutes in the state. In fact, it is actually over in some grade levels. If you don't feel like believing the information I provided or don't like BRSSD's policy I've also linked the District's website so you can contact the administration or the board members. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-minimum-day.htm#did-you-know http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/au/ag/reducingit.asp http://www.brssd.org
Old Timer May 1, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Was nice when children actually did chores and became responsible young adults with a part time jobRead More to manage finances.
Laura Klieves May 8, 2013 at 03:01 am
I'm just now reading this, and haveapizza, I resent that you think that Nesbit parents aren'tRead More involved in their kids' education. I've been involved since my kids started school, and I know many others who are involved too. Oh, and my kids are accountable for their education. Stop bashing Nesbit.
Linda April 29, 2013 at 03:20 am
The current situation is much worse because these are permanent assignments, not just one-yearRead More assignments.
Amy Koo April 29, 2013 at 02:57 am
We will be sharing the latest petition results with the board on May 2nd, so please show yourRead More support by signing if you haven't already. There are only 7 K seats available at Nesbit to handle all of Phase 2 and Phase 3 enrollment. Rather delaying the decision, the board should be proactive and approve the 4th K class at Sandpiper at the May 2nd meeting so that Sandpiper staff can prepare for that additional K class, and parents can move on to collaborating with the district on long term solutions for over-enrollment.
Steve Hayes April 15, 2013 at 03:27 pm
Seems like there is something wrong with this picture - two dogs being way too polite. The focus ofRead More their attention should be on those bones and the bones should be in less than pristine condition!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 15, 2013 at 11:18 am
Good one Ronald!
Ronald Veronda April 14, 2013 at 10:44 pm
Just remember, God is Dog spelled backwards.