.
Feedback

UPDATE: Supes Approve Countywide Plastic Bag Ban Model

The ban will go into effect by April 22, 2013 in unincorporated areas of the county and serve as a model for all cities to adopt city-wide bans.

UPDATED 2:15 p.m.: The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors voted unamimously, 5-0, to approve a model ban on plastic bags by unincorporated areas of the county. The ban will go into effect April 22, 2013, giving businesses time to come up with plans to offer reusable bags.

“We’re going to devote time and energy over the coming months to reach out to consumers and businesses, educating them about the environmental benefits of the ordinance and giving them time to adjust,” said Board President Adrienne J. Tissier, who co-sponsored the ordinance with Supervisor Carole Groom.

The Environmental Impact Report the Board approved during the meeting indicates that 552 million plastic bags are used annually in the 24 cities and the unincorporated area of San Mateo County.

---------------------------------

Tuesday evening, San Mateo County will vote on whether to institute a model plastic bag ban. If it passes, 18 cities in San Mateo County and six more in Santa Clara County will have the opportunity to adopt the ban.

Vanessa Barrington, a public relations manager for Save the Bay, said the move is a monumental one. 

"This type of cross-county regional effort over such a large geographic area is unprecedented," she said. "With the Bay Area’s two largest cities, San Francisco and San Jose, having the strongest bans in the nation, this measure could be a huge boon for the Bay."

Barrington said the push is led by the San Mateo County Department of Environmental Health, and that the measure enjoys the support of The California Grocers Association and many area businesses, municipalities and environmental groups. 

Are plastic shopping bags polluting our bay?

According to members of Save the Bay, run-off pollution from local streets and neighborhoods - including plastic shopping bags, Styrofoam containers and other trash - is the single largest source of Bay pollution.

"Plastic bags and other trash kill wildlife, smother wetlands, and spoil water quality," reads a statement by Save the Bay sent out in advance of Tuesday night's vote. "Policies that encourage reusable shopping bags help clean up our communities and our Bay and save cities money."

In 2011, the City of San Jose passed a landmark ordinance that bans plastic bags and places a small charge on paper bags at all retailers, which went into effect in January of 2012. Other Santa Clara County cities, such as Sunnyvale, have since followed suit.

This year, San Francisco expanded its plastic bag ban to include all retailers - except restaurants, which will be subject to the ban soon - and to place a small charge on paper bags.

The City of South San Francisco adopted a "voluntary plastic bag ban" last year to encourage residents to use reusable bags more.

The average charge for a paper bag is 10 cents.

Currently, Save the Bay members say more than 50 percent of Bay Area residents live in communities that have banned plastic bags. Save The Bay works with cities and counties to enact policies such as bag bans and fees.

Supervisor Carole Groom told Patch she plans to support the model plastic bag ban Tuesday night.

"I'm really pleased by the way we brought industry groups and cities together to craft a regionally consistent set of regulations," Groom said. "We're well on our way toward eliminating a lot of litter from our environment."

 

PATCH WANTS TO KNOW - Do you support the ban of single-use plastic bags in San Mateo County cities? Tell us in the comments below.

 

Stay up-to-date on City and County news such as this - follow Patch!


Don’t be left out of the conversation taking place in Belmont--Sign up for our daily newsletter|Like Belmont|Patch on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter | Start your own blog


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
DJ May 20, 2013 at 05:51 am
Please come to the San Mateo City Council meeting tonight at 7:00 or shortly after and voice yourRead More concern about replacing our community's skating rink with a retail store. Bring something to read/do while we wait for our turn to speak. City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 dina.artzt@comcast.net if you are interested in updates on our cause.
CP May 15, 2013 at 10:05 am
The City has spent time working with the developer, behind closed doors it would seem, yet inputRead More from the public was an afterthought due to MANY families showing up at a May 6 City Council Meeting (not on the Agenda, yet rink to close June 1 !) So many kids spoke so sincerely and eloquently how the closure would hurt them and their friends. Does San Mateo City Hall care about the residents of our community? Especially the children. City Hall has the upper hand (the Master Plan agreement), we expect them to step up. Why has City Hall allowed SPI to make the children of our community suffer so much agony and pain over this process? Shame on City Hall for letting this drag out !!
CP May 13, 2013 at 02:30 am
Don't give up....the kids are worth it! It is wrong for SPI to be in non-compliance with the masterRead More plan. City Hall should be filing some type of injunction to stop closure of the ice center....this is not right. Repeat of what happened with 7 Eleven on North San Mateo Drive when the developer ignored our City ordinances/plans. Why is this happening again in our City of San Mateo?
Z April 5, 2013 at 03:23 pm
I suggest contacting Menlo Park Presbyterian Churh 650.323.8600 or Peninsula Covenant Church (650)Read More 365-8094 Blessings to you!
Linda Thomas April 5, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Eileen, you are heartily invited to visit the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Redwood City. WeRead More are a welcoming, caring group of about 177 people who find music, laughter, social, intellectual and social action pursuits to be eminently spiritual. Our services are at 10:30 a.m. Sundays at 2124 Brewster St. Best work advice at this time is to keep checking Craig's List, the Peninsula section, under both Etc. and part-time jobs.
Joc C May 14, 2013 at 06:49 pm
Parents supporting Redwood Shores Schools for Redwood Shores Kids, very well said. You have my fullRead More support.
Pearl April 29, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Thanks for sharing, Ari!!!! It's been my experience that when you volunteer, you get back way moreRead More than you give! Thanks for the great example you are setting for us all.
Kelly O'Dea April 29, 2013 at 06:23 pm
Ari-Thanks for sharing the adventures of your volunteering projects! You are a great inspiration toRead More our entire community and we are all very proud to have you as a spokesperson on how volunteering can make a huge impact! Thank you very much! Keep on having fun!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 29, 2013 at 04:13 pm
This is a great reminder that any other local volunteers who would like to share their projects withRead More the community may do so on Belmont Patch! Simply email the editor at joan.dentler@patch.com. Great job Ari!
KP May 2, 2013 at 09:43 pm
Again, thank you Brian for this great article about Nesbit. I'm unsure of how it turned into aRead More sounding board for the petulant to vent but those of us who know how wonderful Nesbit is sure appreciate your article.
Joc C May 2, 2013 at 09:30 pm
API of 800 is not bad but parents are comparing it with other schools in the district. There areRead More other issues that make parents unhappy. The residents in RWS and Belmont Shores are paying property tax which contributes to the building of RWSE. There is an expectation that their kids will go to the kids they help fund. The RWS parents are unhappy because they were told they would not be affected by the no boundary policy. Then, a year later 26 families are affected. No one like surprises. The board's decision to use a 'walking distance' algorithm to promote neighborhood schools is not working. Well, hypothetically if Nesbit API is over 900 and the other schools has API of 800, would we still have this discussion? We would not know for sure but something to think about if API is a factor among others.
Brannigan May 2, 2013 at 08:40 pm
I just moved into the neighborhood behind Iron Gate and we bought in Belmont because of the schools.Read More I am kinda shocked to find people bashing Nesbit. The API score is over 800, has great diversity, and the location seems to be pretty convenient. Our son has 2 more years before he starts, but we wouldn't mind one bit if we ended up at Nesbit. What's the difference of 100 points on API that an extra 5 minutes of father-son tutoring time can't fix. Besides, we all end up at Ralston and Carlmont anyways. To me, those are the schools that matter most.
Karen Haas-Foletta May 6, 2013 at 03:32 pm
We have an on-site after care program at Ralson Middle School. Middle School youth are not too oldRead More to be in aftercare. The youth have a chance to exercise, eat a healthy snack, get their homework done, do arts and crafts, be with their friends and most importantly be in a safe, secure and educational environment. We have around 35 youth enrolled on Wednesdays and room for more if anyone is interested. The program is called Footsteps@RAMS.
Joe May 2, 2013 at 11:19 pm
You have to love the Patch, there is always someone complaining about public education. The schoolsRead More really must have failed all of you, because you don't know how to Google anything to educate yourself before you spew your negative opinions. Below are a couple of links that will help you learn. The first informs you of what minimum days are actually for and the second tells you legally why all schools in the county either have them or have shorter school years. For those of you that aren't the best readers or researchers I'll just tell you that BRSSD adheres to the required instructional minutes in the state. In fact, it is actually over in some grade levels. If you don't feel like believing the information I provided or don't like BRSSD's policy I've also linked the District's website so you can contact the administration or the board members. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-minimum-day.htm#did-you-know http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/au/ag/reducingit.asp http://www.brssd.org
Old Timer May 1, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Was nice when children actually did chores and became responsible young adults with a part time jobRead More to manage finances.