.
Feedback

State Senate Passes First New Bill to Reduce Gun Violence

A group of Democrats authored SB 140, the first new gun control bill to pass since the Newtown school shooting in December.

A group of California Democrats has succeeded in getting the first new bill aimed at reducing gun violence passed in the California State Senate since the deadly school shooting in Newtown, Conn. in December.

Co-authored by Leland Yee (D-San Francisco/San Mateo County), SB 140 aims to reduce gun violence by funneling more money into the state's Department of Justice (DOJ) in an effort to track sales of firearms to persons prohibited from owning them.

Existing California law charges fees to firearm dealers and requires them to keep records of their sales. These fees are collected in a special account within the state's General Fund, known as the Dealers' Record of Sales Account (DROS). 

Another existing state law requires the state's Attorney General to establish and maintain an online database known as the Prohibited Armed Persons File, or Armed Prohibited Persons System (APPS), to cross-reference persons who have ownership or possession of a firearm with those who are prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm.

The group of Democrats argue that the cross-referencing of firearm sales records with APPS in order to track sales of firearms to known criminals has lacked too much in recent years. Therefore, SB 140 mandates that $24 million be diverted from the DROS account and be used to expand the DOJ's reach and focus more on cross-referencing and tracking the sales of firearms to prohibited persons.

The text of SB 140, available here online, indicates there is currently a large backlog of entries that need to be made into APPS, and appropriates part of that $24 million to add more manpower to reduce, and hopefully eliminate, that backlog.

The text of the bill also requires that the DOJ give regular updates on how the use of the funds is allowing the department to reduce or eliminate that backlog.

SB 140 was approved by more than the required two-thirds vote in the State Senate this week.

Yee sent out the following statement after the bill's passage:

“I commend my colleagues on both sides of the aisle for supporting this common-sense bill to take guns out of the hands of potentially dangerous people," he said. "Despite unreasonable opposition by the NRA and other gun advocates, the Senate overwhelmingly approved SB 140 and I am hopeful that, in the weeks ahead, the Legislature will take similar action on the rest of our package to reduce gun violence.”

The "package" Yee referred to in his statement is a collection of a few other gun control bills Yee is trying to push forward in California, despite recent threats to his life by those opposed to increased gun control.

Other bills he has authored or co-authored that are still pending include SB 47, which aims to ban the bullet button, as well as assault weapons and other guns that feature or allow quickly-changeable, high-volume magazines; and SB 108, which would require all guns to be properly stored when not in the possession of the owner. 

Current law only requires that gun owners own a trigger lock or safety lock-box for their weapon, but doesn’t require the safety device to be used on an idle firearm. Yee’s bill will specifically require that all guns be properly stored with a trigger lock or in a lock-box at a residence when the owner is not present.

State Senator Leland Yee represents California State Senate District 8, which includes all of San Francisco County and most of San Mateo County, including Woodside.

What do you think of the passage of SB 140, and the other bills Yee is trying to get passed in the State Senate? Tell us your opinion in the comments below.

Also on Belmont and San Carlos Patch:

Man Posing as Sheriff's Deputy Knocking on Doors

Update: Police Say Suspect Captured in Hallmark Neighborhood Was Armed

Mountain Lion Spotted Near Arguello Park

Op-Ed: Opting for Silence

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
DJ May 20, 2013 at 05:51 am
Please come to the San Mateo City Council meeting tonight at 7:00 or shortly after and voice yourRead More concern about replacing our community's skating rink with a retail store. Bring something to read/do while we wait for our turn to speak. City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 dina.artzt@comcast.net if you are interested in updates on our cause.
CP May 15, 2013 at 10:05 am
The City has spent time working with the developer, behind closed doors it would seem, yet inputRead More from the public was an afterthought due to MANY families showing up at a May 6 City Council Meeting (not on the Agenda, yet rink to close June 1 !) So many kids spoke so sincerely and eloquently how the closure would hurt them and their friends. Does San Mateo City Hall care about the residents of our community? Especially the children. City Hall has the upper hand (the Master Plan agreement), we expect them to step up. Why has City Hall allowed SPI to make the children of our community suffer so much agony and pain over this process? Shame on City Hall for letting this drag out !!
CP May 13, 2013 at 02:30 am
Don't give up....the kids are worth it! It is wrong for SPI to be in non-compliance with the masterRead More plan. City Hall should be filing some type of injunction to stop closure of the ice center....this is not right. Repeat of what happened with 7 Eleven on North San Mateo Drive when the developer ignored our City ordinances/plans. Why is this happening again in our City of San Mateo?
Z April 5, 2013 at 03:23 pm
I suggest contacting Menlo Park Presbyterian Churh 650.323.8600 or Peninsula Covenant Church (650)Read More 365-8094 Blessings to you!
Linda Thomas April 5, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Eileen, you are heartily invited to visit the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Redwood City. WeRead More are a welcoming, caring group of about 177 people who find music, laughter, social, intellectual and social action pursuits to be eminently spiritual. Our services are at 10:30 a.m. Sundays at 2124 Brewster St. Best work advice at this time is to keep checking Craig's List, the Peninsula section, under both Etc. and part-time jobs.
Joc C May 14, 2013 at 06:49 pm
Parents supporting Redwood Shores Schools for Redwood Shores Kids, very well said. You have my fullRead More support.
Pearl April 29, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Thanks for sharing, Ari!!!! It's been my experience that when you volunteer, you get back way moreRead More than you give! Thanks for the great example you are setting for us all.
Kelly O'Dea April 29, 2013 at 06:23 pm
Ari-Thanks for sharing the adventures of your volunteering projects! You are a great inspiration toRead More our entire community and we are all very proud to have you as a spokesperson on how volunteering can make a huge impact! Thank you very much! Keep on having fun!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 29, 2013 at 04:13 pm
This is a great reminder that any other local volunteers who would like to share their projects withRead More the community may do so on Belmont Patch! Simply email the editor at joan.dentler@patch.com. Great job Ari!
KP May 2, 2013 at 09:43 pm
Again, thank you Brian for this great article about Nesbit. I'm unsure of how it turned into aRead More sounding board for the petulant to vent but those of us who know how wonderful Nesbit is sure appreciate your article.
Joc C May 2, 2013 at 09:30 pm
API of 800 is not bad but parents are comparing it with other schools in the district. There areRead More other issues that make parents unhappy. The residents in RWS and Belmont Shores are paying property tax which contributes to the building of RWSE. There is an expectation that their kids will go to the kids they help fund. The RWS parents are unhappy because they were told they would not be affected by the no boundary policy. Then, a year later 26 families are affected. No one like surprises. The board's decision to use a 'walking distance' algorithm to promote neighborhood schools is not working. Well, hypothetically if Nesbit API is over 900 and the other schools has API of 800, would we still have this discussion? We would not know for sure but something to think about if API is a factor among others.
Brannigan May 2, 2013 at 08:40 pm
I just moved into the neighborhood behind Iron Gate and we bought in Belmont because of the schools.Read More I am kinda shocked to find people bashing Nesbit. The API score is over 800, has great diversity, and the location seems to be pretty convenient. Our son has 2 more years before he starts, but we wouldn't mind one bit if we ended up at Nesbit. What's the difference of 100 points on API that an extra 5 minutes of father-son tutoring time can't fix. Besides, we all end up at Ralston and Carlmont anyways. To me, those are the schools that matter most.