.
Feedback

Sewer Lateral Discussion to be Continued

Many spoke in opposition of the mandate, which would require homeowners to inspect and repair aging sewer pipes before selling their home.

It was nearly midnight on Tuesday when the Belmont City Council decided to continue their discussion on the requirements for sewer lateral inspections and repairs to a future meeting.

Sewer laterals are the privately owned underground pipes that connect a business or residence to the city sewer system.

The proposed ordinance states that the home buyer has six months to repair the lateral and can buy the house before the repair is made as long as they pay a refundable deposit at the time of sale. The ordinance would also require mandatory sewer lateral inspections for home renovations of more than $50,000.

Public works director Afshin Oskoui gave an overview of the sewer lateral ordinance, including the six specific elements incorporated into the ordinance. In his presentation, Oskoui compared Belmont's proposed ordinance to those of nearby cities like Burlingame, Millbrae and Hillsborough.

Of those six elements, the point of sale, or POS, was the sticking point for those in opposition and a cause of concern for councilmembers. The repair of a sewer lateral could cost between $7,500 and $25,000.

Many realtors are opposed to the ordinance, stating that the requirement could turn away buyers and put sellers in the position of spending thousands of dollars in repairs.

"I would be appalled if the city approves this ordinance," said resident Peter Markovich.

"Right now if you have a problem with a sewer, you call a plumber and have it fixed. This is just adding one more cog in the wheel of running this city and just another revenue stream for the city," he added.

Paul Stewart, government affairs director of the San Mateo County Association of Realtors (SAMCAR) voiced the concern of his organization.

"I urge the council to adopt everything proposed at the March 2012 meeting and abandon the tranfer of title or and not make the inspection mandate at the point of sale."

Adele Della Santina addressed the council as a realtor, a Belmont homeowner and a former planning commissioner and councilmember.

"The city should not become part of the home sale transaction. It becomes a real hardship on the sellers and the buyers," said Della Santina.

Vice Mayor Warren Lieberman was in agreement with Della Santina's concerns stating that POS would cause too much anxiety for the home sellers and buyers. He suggested a simple disclosure form be presented at time of sale.

"I don't find myself in a place where I can support POS," said Lieberman

"I don't see a clear path on this," said Councilmember Dave Warden, and asked city staff what other possible options were available.

And Mayor Christine Wozniak asked the city staff to come back with more quantifiable information on testing methods.

The council will likely continue the discussion of the ordinance at a meeting in April.

Read more Belmont news:

  • Belmont Woman Honored With 'Quiet Hero' Award
  • Can You Step Up to the Plate for Belmont Little League?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Steve Hayes February 27, 2013 at 10:19 pm
I listened last night and heard quite a bit of confusion - the big problem is there is no clear goal.
Some people want to protect new home buyers. The the sewer line is just one of many concerns when you buy a house - among roof, plumbing inside the house, pests/bugs, dry rot, foundation, wiring, chimney etc. Some issues can be seen while others can not. I am not sure why the quality of the sewer line requires City intervention while all other issues are "buyer beware" considerations. A roof replacement can can cost much more than a lateral replacement. The City seems more interested in making sure the infrastructure is properly upgraded (problems fixed) to reduce the amount of water leaking in and out of the pipes. That is a good goal if there is a real problem associated with the laterals. However the remedy will only impact homes being sold and remodeled - that will cause about 300 homes to be checked per year - not a very proactive approach. The City has done smoke testing and has found leak problems, but they seem to be hesitant about enforcing fixes. If 1500 - 2000 Belmont homes have leaky laterals (as was suggested last night) then the City should focus on identifying those pipes and require fixes. The plan proposed will only identify 45-60 bad pipes per year (15% to 20% of the 300 being sold or remodeled) out of the 1500 - 2000 bad pipes throughout the city.
Francesca Karpel March 5, 2013 at 01:31 am
I'm glad that you are covering this story. From what I've learned towns adjacent to Belmont do not require this POS type of inspection and remedy. This would put homeowners in Belmont at a disadvantage in selling their homes.
And since such a small percentage of the housing inventory changes hands in a year it's a highly ineffective way to solve a citywide problem while it is conversely a highly effective way of negatively impacting a homeowners ability to sell his/her home.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Michele Moyer June 16, 2013 at 09:17 am
Thanks Joan - there is one in the sub-head of the blog I posted on School-Force Voices today; wouldRead More love if it could be corrected. Been scratching my head til I saw this post :)
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) June 16, 2013 at 11:20 am
Sorry about that! There's nothing I can do on my end----it's system-wide bug, which I believe isRead More fixed now. :)
Belmont96 June 13, 2013 at 09:40 am
I also preferred the 'old' Patch - this format makes it difficult to find articles that are aren'tRead More that old. One example was the informative article on who was running for city Council. I was having problems finding it and finally had to query on a candidate's name to find. I don't recall having that issue with the original format. Also our neighborhood had a water break line and we were without water for some hours a few Sundays ago. I tried to find out the reason for the break (because of construction or old pipes?) and could not find anything on the Patch regarding this. Not sure if they just didn't report or I just couldn't find.
Judi June 14, 2013 at 07:28 am
Not crazy about the new Patch either. Also, I want to post-for sale, and this section is crowdedRead More with announcements, etc.
Pearl June 14, 2013 at 04:15 pm
Another thing that needs to be fixed: When you go to leave a comment, it takes you over to whereRead More you have to sign in, you sign in expecting to be returned to the article on which you are commenting, but it, instead, takes you back to some different article. PLEASE FIX THIS!!!! Also, please reinstate the feature where we can sign up to be notified if/when more comments are made concerning the article(s) we've commented on so we can follow the conversation. Thank you.
Christa Bigue (Editor) June 10, 2013 at 01:50 pm
Thanks Sam! You should also post this Half Moon Bay (halfmoonbay.patch.com) and Pacifica PatchRead More (pacifica.patch.com)! I'm sure our readers would appreciate the great tip!
Michael Williams June 9, 2013 at 04:12 pm
Strongly suggest Patch readers check all the YELP reviews of this business. Very uneven experiencesRead More reported.
don torre June 4, 2013 at 06:55 am
what do the local Belmont restaurants think of this? do these people pay a license to the city?
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) June 4, 2013 at 07:15 am
Hi Don....thanks for your question. Yes, Off the Grid does pay a licensing fee to the city, and soRead More far, we haven't heard any concerns by local restaurants. The food trucks provide an option to a traditional restaurant---pick up and go----and they are only around 4-5 hours per week (on Mondays, typically not a big restaurant night anyway). Have you tried the food yet?