.
Feedback

Private School Offers City $1 Million to Build on Davis Drive

Crystal Springs Uplands School has increased its offer to the City of Belmont to a one-time payment of $1 million, plus $250,000 per year, but one city councilmember says no amount of money will convince her that Davis Drive is the right location for the

The pencils of the (CSUS) board of directors have been sharpened even further as the board urges the to approve its proposal to build a 47,000 square foot private, independent middle school campus on

In a newly issued development agreement submitted earlier this week to the city, the CSUS board of directors is offering a $1 million, one-time payment and an annual payment of $250,000 to offset the that would be paid to the city by a for-profit business on the site, 6 and 8-10 Davis Dr.

To view the Development Agreement document, click on the PDF file to the right of this article.

 “We heard the about money so we’ve increased our annual payment offer from $175,000 to $250,000,” said Andrea Edwards, CSUS development director.

As a nonprofit organization, Crystal Springs Uplands School is tax-exempt; its offer of a $250,000 annual payment is to make up for lost tax revenue.

Edwards added that the revised amount should be enough to make up for tax revenues lost to the (BRSSD).

The city and Belmont Fire Protection District earn about $40,000 a year in property taxes currently from the vacant property. BRSSD and other taxing agencies get another $100,000 or so in property taxes from the property.

 “This new agreement makes the project a ‘fiscal positive,’” said Edwards.

But says that there’s no amount of money that will make the project fly on the proposed site.

“Yes, it’s a good offer, but it’s not going to make any difference to me because the school site is in the wrong place. And if something is wrong, you can’t pay to fix it,” said Feierbach.

 “This project will directly impact the surrounding neighborhoods and I put neighborhoods first,” she added.

Feierbach says that when it comes to voting on projects proposed by entities such as schools, it’s difficult for the council to be objective.

“We went through this with and ,” Feierbach said, referring to past projects that came before the council and were divisive to the city, the neighborhoods and the schools involved.

“The turned most of the the CSUS proposal down, and it was very difficult for them. We should have stopped this project a long time ago.”

“It takes so much energy and it’s always very controversial because schools, sports, churches--are sacrosanct. The council can deal with a business like or , but because we are dealing with schools---and children—it’s very difficult.  I’m a grandparent and I know how hard it is.”

Feierbach said she would support CSUS’s move to Belmont but to a different location, such as to an area on the east side of Highway 101.

Other councilmembers either declined to comment on this proposal prior to the meeting, or were unavailable for comment.

The new agreement was devised following the of the Belmont Planning Commission, when the seven-member panel recommended that the city council not approve the development deal that would have guaranteed the city $175,000 annually, in addition to a $100,000 one-time payment.

The commission also did not recommend amending the city’s general plan and did not recommend changing the zoning laws to allow for institutional use on the property currently zoned for commercial.

Currently, the proposed site is comprised of approximately 83,000 square feet of commercial/office and warehouse buildings. The buildings, owned by Cengage Learning, have been vacant for several years. CSUS's proposal calls for the demolition of the current buildings and construction of the middle school with a gymnasium, theater, and multi-purpose room, parking lot,and an all-weather synthetic turf playing field. The development agreement allows the city use of the playing field on weekends and for three weeks each summer.

In addition to additional funding, the revised development agreement addressed the commission and residents’ concerns about noise, specifically the noise that would be associated with a swimming pool that the school plans to add in a year or so. Under the new agreement, a swimming pool would be completely enclosed, thus mitigating any noise concerns by residents.

, many of whom live in the neighborhoods surrounding the Davis Drive complex, have complained that the school would add too much traffic and bring too much noise to the hillside area off of Ralston Avenue.

Edwards said that there are detailed plans in place to mitigate any traffic issues caused by the 240 students and staff members arriving and departing the school each day.

“If certain things occur, we have an insurance bond that will handle things such as traffic spilling out of the turning lanes,” Edwards said.

Edwards says that CSUS school officials want the citizens of Belmont to know they look forward to being part of the community.

“This is a remarkable opportunity for CSUS to make an immediate positive impact on the Belmont,” Edwards said.

The Belmont City Council will hear the proposal and make a final determination on the project at it’s September 11 meeting.

 

Don’t be left out of the conversation taking place in Belmont--Sign up for our daily newsletter|Like Belmont Patch on Facebook | Follow Belmont Patch on Twitter |

Want to share your opinions with your community? Start your own blog by clicking here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
CP May 15, 2013 at 10:05 am
The City has spent time working with the developer, behind closed doors it would seem, yet inputRead More from the public was an afterthought due to MANY families showing up at a May 6 City Council Meeting (not on the Agenda, yet rink to close June 1 !) So many kids spoke so sincerely and eloquently how the closure would hurt them and their friends. Does San Mateo City Hall care about the residents of our community? Especially the children. City Hall has the upper hand (the Master Plan agreement), we expect them to step up. Why has City Hall allowed SPI to make the children of our community suffer so much agony and pain over this process? Shame on City Hall for letting this drag out !!
CP May 13, 2013 at 02:30 am
Don't give up....the kids are worth it! It is wrong for SPI to be in non-compliance with the masterRead More plan. City Hall should be filing some type of injunction to stop closure of the ice center....this is not right. Repeat of what happened with 7 Eleven on North San Mateo Drive when the developer ignored our City ordinances/plans. Why is this happening again in our City of San Mateo?
Judi May 11, 2013 at 01:20 pm
Post the link to the City Council email if you can... it always makes it easier for those not usedRead More to communicating with government.
Joc C May 14, 2013 at 06:49 pm
Parents supporting Redwood Shores Schools for Redwood Shores Kids, very well said. You have my fullRead More support.
Pearl April 29, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Thanks for sharing, Ari!!!! It's been my experience that when you volunteer, you get back way moreRead More than you give! Thanks for the great example you are setting for us all.
Kelly O'Dea April 29, 2013 at 06:23 pm
Ari-Thanks for sharing the adventures of your volunteering projects! You are a great inspiration toRead More our entire community and we are all very proud to have you as a spokesperson on how volunteering can make a huge impact! Thank you very much! Keep on having fun!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 29, 2013 at 04:13 pm
This is a great reminder that any other local volunteers who would like to share their projects withRead More the community may do so on Belmont Patch! Simply email the editor at joan.dentler@patch.com. Great job Ari!
KP May 2, 2013 at 09:43 pm
Again, thank you Brian for this great article about Nesbit. I'm unsure of how it turned into aRead More sounding board for the petulant to vent but those of us who know how wonderful Nesbit is sure appreciate your article.
Joc C May 2, 2013 at 09:30 pm
API of 800 is not bad but parents are comparing it with other schools in the district. There areRead More other issues that make parents unhappy. The residents in RWS and Belmont Shores are paying property tax which contributes to the building of RWSE. There is an expectation that their kids will go to the kids they help fund. The RWS parents are unhappy because they were told they would not be affected by the no boundary policy. Then, a year later 26 families are affected. No one like surprises. The board's decision to use a 'walking distance' algorithm to promote neighborhood schools is not working. Well, hypothetically if Nesbit API is over 900 and the other schools has API of 800, would we still have this discussion? We would not know for sure but something to think about if API is a factor among others.
Brannigan May 2, 2013 at 08:40 pm
I just moved into the neighborhood behind Iron Gate and we bought in Belmont because of the schools.Read More I am kinda shocked to find people bashing Nesbit. The API score is over 800, has great diversity, and the location seems to be pretty convenient. Our son has 2 more years before he starts, but we wouldn't mind one bit if we ended up at Nesbit. What's the difference of 100 points on API that an extra 5 minutes of father-son tutoring time can't fix. Besides, we all end up at Ralston and Carlmont anyways. To me, those are the schools that matter most.
Karen Haas-Foletta May 6, 2013 at 03:32 pm
We have an on-site after care program at Ralson Middle School. Middle School youth are not too oldRead More to be in aftercare. The youth have a chance to exercise, eat a healthy snack, get their homework done, do arts and crafts, be with their friends and most importantly be in a safe, secure and educational environment. We have around 35 youth enrolled on Wednesdays and room for more if anyone is interested. The program is called Footsteps@RAMS.
Joe May 2, 2013 at 11:19 pm
You have to love the Patch, there is always someone complaining about public education. The schoolsRead More really must have failed all of you, because you don't know how to Google anything to educate yourself before you spew your negative opinions. Below are a couple of links that will help you learn. The first informs you of what minimum days are actually for and the second tells you legally why all schools in the county either have them or have shorter school years. For those of you that aren't the best readers or researchers I'll just tell you that BRSSD adheres to the required instructional minutes in the state. In fact, it is actually over in some grade levels. If you don't feel like believing the information I provided or don't like BRSSD's policy I've also linked the District's website so you can contact the administration or the board members. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-minimum-day.htm#did-you-know http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/au/ag/reducingit.asp http://www.brssd.org
Old Timer May 1, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Was nice when children actually did chores and became responsible young adults with a part time jobRead More to manage finances.
Laura Klieves May 8, 2013 at 03:01 am
I'm just now reading this, and haveapizza, I resent that you think that Nesbit parents aren'tRead More involved in their kids' education. I've been involved since my kids started school, and I know many others who are involved too. Oh, and my kids are accountable for their education. Stop bashing Nesbit.
Linda April 29, 2013 at 03:20 am
The current situation is much worse because these are permanent assignments, not just one-yearRead More assignments.
Amy Koo April 29, 2013 at 02:57 am
We will be sharing the latest petition results with the board on May 2nd, so please show yourRead More support by signing if you haven't already. There are only 7 K seats available at Nesbit to handle all of Phase 2 and Phase 3 enrollment. Rather delaying the decision, the board should be proactive and approve the 4th K class at Sandpiper at the May 2nd meeting so that Sandpiper staff can prepare for that additional K class, and parents can move on to collaborating with the district on long term solutions for over-enrollment.
Steve Hayes April 15, 2013 at 03:27 pm
Seems like there is something wrong with this picture - two dogs being way too polite. The focus ofRead More their attention should be on those bones and the bones should be in less than pristine condition!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 15, 2013 at 11:18 am
Good one Ronald!
Ronald Veronda April 14, 2013 at 10:44 pm
Just remember, God is Dog spelled backwards.