PG&E To Charge Ratepayers For More Than Half of $2.2 Billion Pipeline Project

The approval angered officials from San Bruno, where a pipeline explosion killed eight people in 2010.

-By Bay City News-

The California Public Utilities Commission today approved a plan
that will allow PG&E to charge ratepayers for more than half of a $2.2
billion project to upgrade its natural gas pipelines.

The approval of the plan, with a last-minute change removing a
requirement that the utility take lower profits for five years, angered
officials from San Bruno where a ruptured pipeline resulted in an explosion
that killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes in 2010.

PG&E's project includes pressure testing 783 miles of natural gas
pipelines, replacing 186 miles of pipelines while upgrading another 199 miles
and installing 228 automatic shutoff valves.

The plan approved by the CPUC at its meeting in San Francisco
today requires PG&E ratepayers to foot the bill for roughly 55 percent of the
projects while the utility's shareholders will fund the rest.

An initial ruling had initially put ratepayers on the hook for
roughly 49 percent of the project and initially included a five-year term in
which PG&E's rate of profit on its improvement investments would be reduced
to 6.05 percent as part of a judge's recommendation.

But Wednesday evening, regulators amended the plan to disallow
that recommendation and raise the rate to about 11 percent, giving what San
Bruno Mayor Jim Ruane said equated to a $130 million "Christmas present" to

"It's a slap in the face," Ruane said. "They blew up our town,
they killed eight people, and here we are giving them cash."

State Sen. Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, said the change showed that
"PG&E owns the state of California and the PUC."

Hill said, "It's shameful that they would allow PG&E to profit
from their behavior, their negligence, their poor maintenance."

Thomas Long, legal director for the watchdog group The Utility
Reform Network, said many of the pipelines in the project are only being
replaced because PG&E lost the records for them.

"They had no idea if these pipelines were operating at safe
pressures," Long said. "PG&E loses records, we should pay for it?"

PG&E spokeswoman Brittany Chord said the utility's shareholders
have already spent $1.5 billion since 2010 on work to meet previously
existing regulations and that "this proposed plan was put forward to address
new safety expectations that were set by the CPUC."

Chord said, "We know we made a lot of mistakes, and we know we
have a lot of work to do."

She said PG&E had sought to have ratepayers fund a higher
percentage of the pipeline project -- which is expected to add about $2 to
the average monthly residential utility bill -- but they were rebuffed by the

In announcing the commission's decision, Commissioner Mike Florio
said the project was "about moving forward and creating the safest natural
gas infrastructure in the nation."

Florio said the ruling was a balance between the requests of PG&E
and those of San Bruno officials and survivors of the blast.

"We have to make sure PG&E isn't rewarded for the past ... but we
can't expect PG&E in the past to meet standards that didn't exist until now,"
he said.
Copyright © 2012 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse
without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited.

What do you think? Should ratepayers be asked to help pay for the upgrades to the gas transmission lines?  Tell us in comments.

Do you subscribe to the Burlingame-Hillsborough Patch newsletter? It brings our latest stories, blogs, announcements and the day's calendar events to your in-box early each morning. Follow Benicia Patch on Facebook and Twitter.

Do you have opinions, experiences and views to share? Consider becoming a Burlingame-Hillsborough Patch blogger!

If there’s something in this article you think should be corrected, or if something else is amiss email the editor at burlingame@patch.com.

Rob Chapman December 21, 2012 at 06:57 AM
Disgusting, revolting, sickening, corrupt. Those are just a few of the words to describe PG&E and the CPUC.
Peter December 21, 2012 at 05:58 PM
All I can say is that the public are sheep when it comes to "paid for" community services be it PG&E or trash pick up. Each one dictates the terms, a government agency ways in all the options, and we get stuck. I don't mind paying taxes but I do mind it when the buyer - us - are forced to accept conditions that benefit the seller more than the buyer! PG& E is responsible for ensuring safe pipelines and has floated too many years without securing and ensuring proper safety measures. I'll bet there are a lot of employees at public service companies who have found themselves in comprimising situations that force them to weigh the public good against their own security and said nothing or were quietly removed from "sensitive" operations. In the case of PG& E we know that the PUC does not have the public's best interest at the center of their decisions. At the same time we know deregulation does not work in the energy market - too few sources for energy and the delivery systems are locked up. Baahhhhh


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »