.
Feedback

Packard Foundation Opens Sustainable & Stunning HQ

The LEED Platinum-certified headquarters for the international grant-making foundation located in Los Altos is both beautiful and technologically smart. Now, can it change humans' behavior?

 

After a year and a half of construction, the formally opened its new Los Altos headquarters Friday—a stunning cedar-and-copper-clad showcase to demonstrate how sustainability is possible.

It is replete with touches from the past that gives it firm anchor, and embraces full-on, the technology that can bring a better future. The new 49,000-square foot building is designed for Net-Zero, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Platinum certification. As such, that means it will generate as much energy as it uses.

Platinum is the highest ranking in the LEED green building rating system. 

The 48-year-old Packard Foundation wanted to show how serious it is about “walking its talk,” said Carol Larson, the foundation’s president and CEO

The foundation is known for its mission of environmental restoration and protection, part of four program areas in which it makes grants. The other three are population and reproductive health, children, and the local community.

“In building our new headquarters to the highest standards of sustainability, and in a way that others can replicate, the Packard Foundation has taken the extra steps necessary to truly live its core values and mission,” Larson said.

“We hope to inspire others with the possibility of a better future.” She said added that it was designed to be able to replicate anywhere in the country, to provide a model for those looking toward more sustainable building practices.

The two office wings—named “Woodlands” and “Grasslands,” as a touchstone from the Packard ranch—are united by a central courtyard that also functions as informal gathering space and focal point.

The foundation said its extra steps included:

  • Drastically reducing use of energy by installing solar panels that offset 100 percent of the building’s energy consumption, using innovative gutters, toilets and irrigation systems that reduce water usage by 40 percent. The building is designed to capture rainwater from its roofs to two 10,000-gallon storage tanks below.
  • Landscaping the grounds with 90 percent native plants, and others that are drought-tolerant. Innovative use of “rain gardens” that channel runoff from the street filter water rather than allowing it to go into storm drains and into the bay.
  • Using Forest Stewardship Council-certified wood to provide incentives for those who harvest wood with consideration for human rights, land usage, environmental impact and conservation.
  • Creating a mindful culture among its 120 employees by providing dashboards so they can monitor their actions in real time the energy use of charging devices and printing, for example.
  • Setting an example by which others can also construct their environmentally sustainable building. The Foundation estimates it would cost $477 per square foot to employ the environmentally friendly technologies used in the building.

Even before construction began, the Packard Foundation made sure they considered the environmental impact throughout. In deconstructing the existing buildings in 2010, they salvaged 95 percent of the structures. The building was designed with “aggressive reductions” in plug loads.

Mike Humphrey, project executive for the construction company, DPR, said the project was “anything but traditional,” including “some of the most advanced and sufficient systems available today.” He praised the Packard Foundation for its commitment to stick to its vision even through the financial crisis.

The building’s energy usage can be monitored online at the foundation’s website, Larson said, so anyone from the public, not just the organization’s employees and board can see how well they are doing and how they can make adjustments, she said. Advanced monitors provide feedback that allow workers to make decisions about what windows could be opened to adjust temperature effectively, for example. 

Susan Packard Orr, chairman of the foundation board, and the daughter of David and Lucile Packard, talked about how the foundation had began in the family home on Taafe Road in 1964, then moved to "a little brick building" in town, and then finally to the longtime home at 300 Second Street that her mother loved. As the organization grew, however, its program staff was spread across two buildings in Los Altos. Now all four programs will be housed under one roof. The investment staff will be housed in the old building.

"My parents cared deeply about the environment and about empowering individuals to do their best work, "Packard Orr said. "Today the Foundation that sustains my parents' work celebrates their memory by opening a new headquarters that support those values."

The building makes use of the California climate, with the familiar easy passage between indoor and outdoor, said Brad Jacobson, project manager and a senior associate of San Francisco-based architecture firm EHDD, which also designed the Monterey Bay Aquarium . Once they met at the Packard home in Los Altos Hills, which is used for retreats, Jacobson said they understood how integral that element should be to the new building.  

There are other, serendipitous touches. The interior doors are made from eucalyptus that was felled during the relocation of Doyle Drive that leads to in San Francisco. The architects came across the wood when they were at the veneer shop in Oakland. Reusing the eucalyptus, so prevalent across the California landscape, was a happy accident of circumstance, said architect Marc L’Italien, principal at EHDD.

The south western side of the building uses wide eaves to shade the windows from the sun, and light sensitive shades automatically move up or down to keep sun from directly shining into the building. The northeastern side does not have such overhangs and takes advantage of the morning sun, he said. There is a “living roof “ on one side where the board room is, planted with succulents and other plants that serve to filter water. From the windows of the board room, participants can look directly across to the windows of the board room of the old Packard headquarters, another anchor to the past that informs it mission and goals.

Packard  Orr said her parents would be “fascinated and delighted at what we’ve achieved here in Los Altos—bringing together technology and design in a beautiful space that is good for the environment and good for the people who live here.”

For more pictures beyond this article, go to www.packard.org

 Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
DJ May 20, 2013 at 05:51 am
Please come to the San Mateo City Council meeting tonight at 7:00 or shortly after and voice yourRead More concern about replacing our community's skating rink with a retail store. Bring something to read/do while we wait for our turn to speak. City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 dina.artzt@comcast.net if you are interested in updates on our cause.
CP May 15, 2013 at 10:05 am
The City has spent time working with the developer, behind closed doors it would seem, yet inputRead More from the public was an afterthought due to MANY families showing up at a May 6 City Council Meeting (not on the Agenda, yet rink to close June 1 !) So many kids spoke so sincerely and eloquently how the closure would hurt them and their friends. Does San Mateo City Hall care about the residents of our community? Especially the children. City Hall has the upper hand (the Master Plan agreement), we expect them to step up. Why has City Hall allowed SPI to make the children of our community suffer so much agony and pain over this process? Shame on City Hall for letting this drag out !!
CP May 13, 2013 at 02:30 am
Don't give up....the kids are worth it! It is wrong for SPI to be in non-compliance with the masterRead More plan. City Hall should be filing some type of injunction to stop closure of the ice center....this is not right. Repeat of what happened with 7 Eleven on North San Mateo Drive when the developer ignored our City ordinances/plans. Why is this happening again in our City of San Mateo?
Z April 5, 2013 at 03:23 pm
I suggest contacting Menlo Park Presbyterian Churh 650.323.8600 or Peninsula Covenant Church (650)Read More 365-8094 Blessings to you!
Linda Thomas April 5, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Eileen, you are heartily invited to visit the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Redwood City. WeRead More are a welcoming, caring group of about 177 people who find music, laughter, social, intellectual and social action pursuits to be eminently spiritual. Our services are at 10:30 a.m. Sundays at 2124 Brewster St. Best work advice at this time is to keep checking Craig's List, the Peninsula section, under both Etc. and part-time jobs.
Joc C May 14, 2013 at 06:49 pm
Parents supporting Redwood Shores Schools for Redwood Shores Kids, very well said. You have my fullRead More support.
Pearl April 29, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Thanks for sharing, Ari!!!! It's been my experience that when you volunteer, you get back way moreRead More than you give! Thanks for the great example you are setting for us all.
Kelly O'Dea April 29, 2013 at 06:23 pm
Ari-Thanks for sharing the adventures of your volunteering projects! You are a great inspiration toRead More our entire community and we are all very proud to have you as a spokesperson on how volunteering can make a huge impact! Thank you very much! Keep on having fun!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 29, 2013 at 04:13 pm
This is a great reminder that any other local volunteers who would like to share their projects withRead More the community may do so on Belmont Patch! Simply email the editor at joan.dentler@patch.com. Great job Ari!
KP May 2, 2013 at 09:43 pm
Again, thank you Brian for this great article about Nesbit. I'm unsure of how it turned into aRead More sounding board for the petulant to vent but those of us who know how wonderful Nesbit is sure appreciate your article.
Joc C May 2, 2013 at 09:30 pm
API of 800 is not bad but parents are comparing it with other schools in the district. There areRead More other issues that make parents unhappy. The residents in RWS and Belmont Shores are paying property tax which contributes to the building of RWSE. There is an expectation that their kids will go to the kids they help fund. The RWS parents are unhappy because they were told they would not be affected by the no boundary policy. Then, a year later 26 families are affected. No one like surprises. The board's decision to use a 'walking distance' algorithm to promote neighborhood schools is not working. Well, hypothetically if Nesbit API is over 900 and the other schools has API of 800, would we still have this discussion? We would not know for sure but something to think about if API is a factor among others.
Brannigan May 2, 2013 at 08:40 pm
I just moved into the neighborhood behind Iron Gate and we bought in Belmont because of the schools.Read More I am kinda shocked to find people bashing Nesbit. The API score is over 800, has great diversity, and the location seems to be pretty convenient. Our son has 2 more years before he starts, but we wouldn't mind one bit if we ended up at Nesbit. What's the difference of 100 points on API that an extra 5 minutes of father-son tutoring time can't fix. Besides, we all end up at Ralston and Carlmont anyways. To me, those are the schools that matter most.