.
Feedback

City Opposes the Sale of Rodent Poison

The poison could pose a risk to children, pets and wildlife.

At its October 9th meeting, the Belmont City Council passed a resolution opposing the sale and purchase of rat and mouse poisons, which are deemed an unreasonable risk to children, pets and wildlife. 

The use of such poisons is regulated by the State of California and this resolution does not mandate the ban of poisons, however, it does urge Belmont businesses to stop the sale of 10 specific rat and mouse poisons that do not incorporate safety measures specified in the US EPA’s Final Risk Mitigation Decision for these rodenticides. 

The resolution also urges Belmont residents to avoid buying these products and encourages the use of less-toxic rodent control methods. 

To read the full text of the city council resolution, including the list of the 10 specific rodent poisons, click here.

 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
DJ May 20, 2013 at 05:51 am
Please come to the San Mateo City Council meeting tonight at 7:00 or shortly after and voice yourRead More concern about replacing our community's skating rink with a retail store. Bring something to read/do while we wait for our turn to speak. City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 dina.artzt@comcast.net if you are interested in updates on our cause.
CP May 15, 2013 at 10:05 am
The City has spent time working with the developer, behind closed doors it would seem, yet inputRead More from the public was an afterthought due to MANY families showing up at a May 6 City Council Meeting (not on the Agenda, yet rink to close June 1 !) So many kids spoke so sincerely and eloquently how the closure would hurt them and their friends. Does San Mateo City Hall care about the residents of our community? Especially the children. City Hall has the upper hand (the Master Plan agreement), we expect them to step up. Why has City Hall allowed SPI to make the children of our community suffer so much agony and pain over this process? Shame on City Hall for letting this drag out !!
Z April 5, 2013 at 03:23 pm
I suggest contacting Menlo Park Presbyterian Churh 650.323.8600 or Peninsula Covenant Church (650)Read More 365-8094 Blessings to you!
Linda Thomas April 5, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Eileen, you are heartily invited to visit the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Redwood City. WeRead More are a welcoming, caring group of about 177 people who find music, laughter, social, intellectual and social action pursuits to be eminently spiritual. Our services are at 10:30 a.m. Sundays at 2124 Brewster St. Best work advice at this time is to keep checking Craig's List, the Peninsula section, under both Etc. and part-time jobs.
Pearl April 29, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Thanks for sharing, Ari!!!! It's been my experience that when you volunteer, you get back way moreRead More than you give! Thanks for the great example you are setting for us all.
Kelly O'Dea April 29, 2013 at 06:23 pm
Ari-Thanks for sharing the adventures of your volunteering projects! You are a great inspiration toRead More our entire community and we are all very proud to have you as a spokesperson on how volunteering can make a huge impact! Thank you very much! Keep on having fun!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 29, 2013 at 04:13 pm
This is a great reminder that any other local volunteers who would like to share their projects withRead More the community may do so on Belmont Patch! Simply email the editor at joan.dentler@patch.com. Great job Ari!
Ilse May 1, 2013 at 05:52 pm
In the end a lottery would have been the fairest option. No solution will guarantee that all kidsRead More can attend the school of their choice. Thus, why not give all taxpayers the same shot at the school of their choice? Instead we have the no boundary cop out which gives priority to those with the most money (ie those who can afford to live closest to a school). This will result in a marginalization of several fringe neighborhoods where home prices are more affordable - 6th Ave, Harbor, Chula Vista, and Hastings. These neighborhoods will enroll in different schools each year depending on the numbers across the district. They will see their home values fall while those closest to the schools will see their values rise. This is even less equitable than a boundary solution in that those father from the school would have a similar shot to those closer (assuming both are in the boundary). Yet another example of our elected officials developing policies that financially benefit those that least need it.
Joc C May 1, 2013 at 05:45 pm
Courtney, I am not in favor of lottery either. However, if you ask me to choose between 'noRead More boundary' and 'lottery', I will choose lottery. Lottery based on probability of a draw and mathematically it is fair unless the draw is rigged. If it is OK for RWS kids to go to Nesbit, it would be OK for any kids anywhere in the district to go to any schools. About your comment on people have opportunity to voice opinions, sure there are in the school board meetings but it's not effective as parents talk, board pretends to listen and nothing happen after that weeks after weeks. The bigger issue CR brought up is the lack of communications or the false promise the board made that "RWS are not impacted". If they were not going to be impacted, there are better things to do than to sit in the school board meetings where your opinions are not valued. I am with CR on this. If the school board has guts, let's have a fully open discussion and follow by a vote 'for or against' the no boundary policy. One household one vote. Let people have their say. Whatever the outcome, people will have to accept it as majority decision.
Redwood Shores May 1, 2013 at 05:27 pm
They need to redraw the boundaries so that when people buy a home they will know what school theirRead More home is zoned for. This is insanity! So if certain parts of Central and Redwood Shores are zoned for Nesbit there is full disclosure and families know what school they will get. The School Board took the easy way out with the No Boundaries solution and this has been the outcome for the past two years...upset parents.
Old Timer May 1, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Was nice when children actually did chores and became responsible young adults with a part time jobRead More to manage finances.
Redwood Shores May 1, 2013 at 01:18 pm
Yes, it is fantastic Belmont is helping out at Barrett and the Belmont Llibrary on WednesdayRead More afternoons from 12:20 on. (This is more a question for the school district, why we have two full weeks before Thanksgiving break for conferences November 12 - 23, 2012 and two full weeks after winter break for conferences March 12 - 20, 2013. Parents are not even required to attend the March conferences, so why even have them. Just mail the report cards home and have two full weeks of school. Also, in most school districts conferences are handled in two days. Everyone has two days off of school and they are finished in two days. It does not go on for weeks on end of half days. I was shocked to hear this happened in the BRSSD.) Sorry for going off topic, Joan. I hope at some point Barrett can be torn down and fully renovated, but first the roads....
Kristina Turner May 1, 2013 at 12:47 pm
Agreed. Nice article about Barrett... but why are there so many "planning" andRead More "staff development" days? That's 50 afternoons that kids are missing out on school and their development. Ah, but this is supposed to be a positive article about how our community is working to deal with the shortcomings of our schools. So, thank you Barrett community center and Belmont libraries for taking these extra steps to keep these kids focused on something positive. Thanks for encouraging sports and physical activity as well.
Linda April 29, 2013 at 03:20 am
The current situation is much worse because these are permanent assignments, not just one-yearRead More assignments.
Amy Koo April 29, 2013 at 02:57 am
We will be sharing the latest petition results with the board on May 2nd, so please show yourRead More support by signing if you haven't already. There are only 7 K seats available at Nesbit to handle all of Phase 2 and Phase 3 enrollment. Rather delaying the decision, the board should be proactive and approve the 4th K class at Sandpiper at the May 2nd meeting so that Sandpiper staff can prepare for that additional K class, and parents can move on to collaborating with the district on long term solutions for over-enrollment.
Linda April 28, 2013 at 03:34 pm
@haveapizza: As a RWS resident, I find your comment to be offensive, arrogant and completelyRead More unhelpful to the conversation. I've heard great things about Nesbit, and I would never presume that parents in that neighborhood care less or are less involved than parents at schools in RWS. If there's a discrepancy in test scores, it's due to the much higher percentage of English learners at Nesbit.
Steve Hayes April 15, 2013 at 03:27 pm
Seems like there is something wrong with this picture - two dogs being way too polite. The focus ofRead More their attention should be on those bones and the bones should be in less than pristine condition!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 15, 2013 at 11:18 am
Good one Ronald!
Ronald Veronda April 14, 2013 at 10:44 pm
Just remember, God is Dog spelled backwards.