.
Feedback

Transient to Stand Trial in Beating Death of Albert Korn

Three Belmont police officers were called to the witness stand to testify during the preliminary hearing.

 

Judge Mark Forcum found sufficient evidence against Tyler James Hutchinson to have the 24-year-old transient stand trial for the murder of 88-year-old Albert Korn of Belmont, following a 90-minute preliminary hearing Friday in San Mateo County Superior Court.

Hutchinson will be arraigned on all charges on March 2 at 10 a.m. in Superior Court.

At the arraignment, the charges against the defendant will be read or the defendant will be asked if he is aware of the charges against him, and will be asked how he wishes to plead. 

Hutchinson is accused of robbing, burglarizing and beating 88-year-old Albert Korn after breaking into his home on Hallmark Drive on June 2, 2009.

When Korn died from his injuries at Stanford Hospital on June 17, 2009, the defendant was subsequently charged with murder with two special enhancements -- murder during a robbery and murder during a burglary -- making Hutchinson eligible for the death penalty, according to the District Attorney's office. 

Last April, Hutchinson was committed to a state hospital after being found mentally unfit to stand trial, but doctors there found him competent and returned him to San Mateo County for prosecution.

Seven witnesses were called during Friday's preliminary hearing, including Belmont Police Officer Don Lewis, who was the first officer on the scene after the victim's son, Matt Korn, called 911 to report the beating. 

When asked by Deputy District Attorney Al Giannini to describe what he found when he arrived at the Korns' home, Lewis said, 'I saw a man on a gurney being pushed down the driveway into an ambulance." 

Lewis was also the first officer to inspect the Korns' Hallmark Drive home for evidence. He collected fingerprints from around the home, specifically from around the window area where the defendant presumably entered the home. Blood samples were also taken from the home by Lewis with swabs, which were sealed and sent to the county's criminal lab for analysis. 

Giannini showed Lewis and the defense team various pieces of evidence including photographs and items that had been sealed in envelopes. All pieces of evidence were labeled and numbered as the "people's exhibit"

Throughout the hearing, the defendant, dressed in a red jumpsuit, sat motionless and stared straight ahead, which was a departure from his behavior during previous hearings in which he was outspoken and at times non-sensical. After his hearing was postponed in December, Hutchinson spat in the face of his defense attorney. 

After the alleged beating, Hutchinson is suspected of going into the garage and stealing Korn's car, a Jaguar. The car was found three days later parked in the 2100 block of Carlmont Drive in Belmont. The car was subsequently transported to the county crime laboratory. 

Other witnesses included Sgt. Mike Supanich of the Belmont Police Department, who was questioned by the deputy district attorney about the conversation he had with the coroner's office as to the cause of Korn's death, which was reported in the death certificate as a cranial hemorrhage. 

David Lashley, a detective with the Belmont Police Department was questioned about the missing Jaguar and the search warrant that was issued for Hutchinson in Yolo County. 

When Hutchinson was identified as a suspect, he was already in custody in Yolo County serving time for an unrelated residential burglary conviction committed in West Sacramento two days after he allegedly assaulted Korn, according to the District Attorney's office.

Following the three Belmont police witnesses, the prosecution called four witnesses from the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office's criminal and forensics laboratory. All four described in detail the process by which DNA, blood, and fingerprints, were collected, identified and analyzed. 

Andrea Weidmann, a criminalist, described DNA testing and analysis performed on various items belonging to the victim and the defendant, including clothing, shoes, household items and the Jaguar. 

With regards to a shirt Hutchinson was wearing the day of the alleged attack, Giannini showed her the enveloped exhibit and asked, "Did you perform DNA testing and analysis on this white t-shirt?" 

"Yes, I did. I first examined the shirt for the presence of blood, and found four different stains in which the primary source of the DNA was from the victim," answered Weidmann.

Giannini then showed Weidmann a laboratory report on DNA found in the Jaguar and on the window screen in the Korns' house. "In my opinion, he (Hutchison) is the source of the DNA," Weidmann said. 

At the conclusion of the hearing, Judge Forcum announced that the court had found satisfactory evidence to proceed with all charges and set the arraignment for March 2. 

In addition to James Thompson, Richard Keyes is Hutchinson's court appointed attorney. 

All evidence has been returned to the Belmont Police Department for inspection by the defense. 

For more news about Belmont and surrounding areas, including unincorporated San Mateo County,  follow us on Twitter  and  "like" us on Facebook.    Get Patched in daily by signing up for our newsletter.

Want to blog for us? Click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
DJ May 20, 2013 at 05:51 am
Please come to the San Mateo City Council meeting tonight at 7:00 or shortly after and voice yourRead More concern about replacing our community's skating rink with a retail store. Bring something to read/do while we wait for our turn to speak. City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 dina.artzt@comcast.net if you are interested in updates on our cause.
CP May 15, 2013 at 10:05 am
The City has spent time working with the developer, behind closed doors it would seem, yet inputRead More from the public was an afterthought due to MANY families showing up at a May 6 City Council Meeting (not on the Agenda, yet rink to close June 1 !) So many kids spoke so sincerely and eloquently how the closure would hurt them and their friends. Does San Mateo City Hall care about the residents of our community? Especially the children. City Hall has the upper hand (the Master Plan agreement), we expect them to step up. Why has City Hall allowed SPI to make the children of our community suffer so much agony and pain over this process? Shame on City Hall for letting this drag out !!
CP May 13, 2013 at 02:30 am
Don't give up....the kids are worth it! It is wrong for SPI to be in non-compliance with the masterRead More plan. City Hall should be filing some type of injunction to stop closure of the ice center....this is not right. Repeat of what happened with 7 Eleven on North San Mateo Drive when the developer ignored our City ordinances/plans. Why is this happening again in our City of San Mateo?
Z April 5, 2013 at 03:23 pm
I suggest contacting Menlo Park Presbyterian Churh 650.323.8600 or Peninsula Covenant Church (650)Read More 365-8094 Blessings to you!
Linda Thomas April 5, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Eileen, you are heartily invited to visit the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Redwood City. WeRead More are a welcoming, caring group of about 177 people who find music, laughter, social, intellectual and social action pursuits to be eminently spiritual. Our services are at 10:30 a.m. Sundays at 2124 Brewster St. Best work advice at this time is to keep checking Craig's List, the Peninsula section, under both Etc. and part-time jobs.
Joc C May 14, 2013 at 06:49 pm
Parents supporting Redwood Shores Schools for Redwood Shores Kids, very well said. You have my fullRead More support.
Pearl April 29, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Thanks for sharing, Ari!!!! It's been my experience that when you volunteer, you get back way moreRead More than you give! Thanks for the great example you are setting for us all.
Kelly O'Dea April 29, 2013 at 06:23 pm
Ari-Thanks for sharing the adventures of your volunteering projects! You are a great inspiration toRead More our entire community and we are all very proud to have you as a spokesperson on how volunteering can make a huge impact! Thank you very much! Keep on having fun!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 29, 2013 at 04:13 pm
This is a great reminder that any other local volunteers who would like to share their projects withRead More the community may do so on Belmont Patch! Simply email the editor at joan.dentler@patch.com. Great job Ari!
KP May 2, 2013 at 09:43 pm
Again, thank you Brian for this great article about Nesbit. I'm unsure of how it turned into aRead More sounding board for the petulant to vent but those of us who know how wonderful Nesbit is sure appreciate your article.
Joc C May 2, 2013 at 09:30 pm
API of 800 is not bad but parents are comparing it with other schools in the district. There areRead More other issues that make parents unhappy. The residents in RWS and Belmont Shores are paying property tax which contributes to the building of RWSE. There is an expectation that their kids will go to the kids they help fund. The RWS parents are unhappy because they were told they would not be affected by the no boundary policy. Then, a year later 26 families are affected. No one like surprises. The board's decision to use a 'walking distance' algorithm to promote neighborhood schools is not working. Well, hypothetically if Nesbit API is over 900 and the other schools has API of 800, would we still have this discussion? We would not know for sure but something to think about if API is a factor among others.
Brannigan May 2, 2013 at 08:40 pm
I just moved into the neighborhood behind Iron Gate and we bought in Belmont because of the schools.Read More I am kinda shocked to find people bashing Nesbit. The API score is over 800, has great diversity, and the location seems to be pretty convenient. Our son has 2 more years before he starts, but we wouldn't mind one bit if we ended up at Nesbit. What's the difference of 100 points on API that an extra 5 minutes of father-son tutoring time can't fix. Besides, we all end up at Ralston and Carlmont anyways. To me, those are the schools that matter most.
Karen Haas-Foletta May 6, 2013 at 03:32 pm
We have an on-site after care program at Ralson Middle School. Middle School youth are not too oldRead More to be in aftercare. The youth have a chance to exercise, eat a healthy snack, get their homework done, do arts and crafts, be with their friends and most importantly be in a safe, secure and educational environment. We have around 35 youth enrolled on Wednesdays and room for more if anyone is interested. The program is called Footsteps@RAMS.
Joe May 2, 2013 at 11:19 pm
You have to love the Patch, there is always someone complaining about public education. The schoolsRead More really must have failed all of you, because you don't know how to Google anything to educate yourself before you spew your negative opinions. Below are a couple of links that will help you learn. The first informs you of what minimum days are actually for and the second tells you legally why all schools in the county either have them or have shorter school years. For those of you that aren't the best readers or researchers I'll just tell you that BRSSD adheres to the required instructional minutes in the state. In fact, it is actually over in some grade levels. If you don't feel like believing the information I provided or don't like BRSSD's policy I've also linked the District's website so you can contact the administration or the board members. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-minimum-day.htm#did-you-know http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/au/ag/reducingit.asp http://www.brssd.org
Old Timer May 1, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Was nice when children actually did chores and became responsible young adults with a part time jobRead More to manage finances.
Laura Klieves May 8, 2013 at 03:01 am
I'm just now reading this, and haveapizza, I resent that you think that Nesbit parents aren'tRead More involved in their kids' education. I've been involved since my kids started school, and I know many others who are involved too. Oh, and my kids are accountable for their education. Stop bashing Nesbit.
Linda April 29, 2013 at 03:20 am
The current situation is much worse because these are permanent assignments, not just one-yearRead More assignments.
Amy Koo April 29, 2013 at 02:57 am
We will be sharing the latest petition results with the board on May 2nd, so please show yourRead More support by signing if you haven't already. There are only 7 K seats available at Nesbit to handle all of Phase 2 and Phase 3 enrollment. Rather delaying the decision, the board should be proactive and approve the 4th K class at Sandpiper at the May 2nd meeting so that Sandpiper staff can prepare for that additional K class, and parents can move on to collaborating with the district on long term solutions for over-enrollment.