.
Feedback

Letter to the Editor: Save the Bridgepointe Ice Rink

A San Mateo resident weighs in on the possibility of losing the Bridgepointe Ice Rink to more retail stores.

Editor's Note: The following article was submitted to San Mateo Patch by Julie McAuliffe and does not necessarily reflect the views of Patch editors. To submit an article for publication, please e-mail joan.dentler@patch.com.

Last Thursday, the first of three public meetings was held in San Mateo to determine the fate of Bridgepointe Ice Rink.

Shopping center owner SPI Holdings has declined to renew the rink's lease in 2013, and plans to demolish the rink in favor of more retail stores.  They have applied to the city for a change to the Bridgepointe master plan that would allow them to meet their recreational amenity obligation in another San Mateo location.

The meeting room was overflowing with several hundred San Mateo and Bay Area residents who oppose demolition of the ice rink.  Many more were turned away and did not get to hear the presentation or ask questions due to the limited size of the venue, which was chosen by SPI.

Two things were very clear; the ice skating patrons of all ages are passionate about their San Mateo ice rink, and the heart of the issue will be the wording in the master plan regarding "ice rink or similar use recreational amenity."

When asked how the proposed alternatives met the similar use requirements, SPI's Peter Meier said he did not want to go into those details nor answer that question.

The ice rink offers a wide variety of multi-age, multi-gender programs, including public open skate, recreational skating lessons, in-house hockey leagues and figure skating programs.  Adult hockey leagues, along with competitive figure skating and youth hockey teams call Bridgepointe their home as well.

According to rink officials, more than 100,000 people use the rink each year. Over the past 25 years, the rink has been home to Olympic medalists and many college and professional hockey players. Gold Medalist Kristi Yamaguchi got her start and spent five years skating at Bridgepointe.

It would be very difficult to find another recreational amenity that would serve so many people with such a wide variety of programs, and the San Mateo ice rink should continue on at Bridgepointe with the strong skating culture that has become an integral part of San Mateo's tradition and recreational presence in the Bay Area.

Like Belmont Patch on Facebook | Follow Belmont Patch on Twitter | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Belmont Patch

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
DJ May 20, 2013 at 05:51 am
Please come to the San Mateo City Council meeting tonight at 7:00 or shortly after and voice yourRead More concern about replacing our community's skating rink with a retail store. Bring something to read/do while we wait for our turn to speak. City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 dina.artzt@comcast.net if you are interested in updates on our cause.
CP May 15, 2013 at 10:05 am
The City has spent time working with the developer, behind closed doors it would seem, yet inputRead More from the public was an afterthought due to MANY families showing up at a May 6 City Council Meeting (not on the Agenda, yet rink to close June 1 !) So many kids spoke so sincerely and eloquently how the closure would hurt them and their friends. Does San Mateo City Hall care about the residents of our community? Especially the children. City Hall has the upper hand (the Master Plan agreement), we expect them to step up. Why has City Hall allowed SPI to make the children of our community suffer so much agony and pain over this process? Shame on City Hall for letting this drag out !!
CP May 13, 2013 at 02:30 am
Don't give up....the kids are worth it! It is wrong for SPI to be in non-compliance with the masterRead More plan. City Hall should be filing some type of injunction to stop closure of the ice center....this is not right. Repeat of what happened with 7 Eleven on North San Mateo Drive when the developer ignored our City ordinances/plans. Why is this happening again in our City of San Mateo?
Z April 5, 2013 at 03:23 pm
I suggest contacting Menlo Park Presbyterian Churh 650.323.8600 or Peninsula Covenant Church (650)Read More 365-8094 Blessings to you!
Linda Thomas April 5, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Eileen, you are heartily invited to visit the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Redwood City. WeRead More are a welcoming, caring group of about 177 people who find music, laughter, social, intellectual and social action pursuits to be eminently spiritual. Our services are at 10:30 a.m. Sundays at 2124 Brewster St. Best work advice at this time is to keep checking Craig's List, the Peninsula section, under both Etc. and part-time jobs.
Joc C May 14, 2013 at 06:49 pm
Parents supporting Redwood Shores Schools for Redwood Shores Kids, very well said. You have my fullRead More support.
Pearl April 29, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Thanks for sharing, Ari!!!! It's been my experience that when you volunteer, you get back way moreRead More than you give! Thanks for the great example you are setting for us all.
Kelly O'Dea April 29, 2013 at 06:23 pm
Ari-Thanks for sharing the adventures of your volunteering projects! You are a great inspiration toRead More our entire community and we are all very proud to have you as a spokesperson on how volunteering can make a huge impact! Thank you very much! Keep on having fun!
Joan S. Dentler (Editor) April 29, 2013 at 04:13 pm
This is a great reminder that any other local volunteers who would like to share their projects withRead More the community may do so on Belmont Patch! Simply email the editor at joan.dentler@patch.com. Great job Ari!
KP May 2, 2013 at 09:43 pm
Again, thank you Brian for this great article about Nesbit. I'm unsure of how it turned into aRead More sounding board for the petulant to vent but those of us who know how wonderful Nesbit is sure appreciate your article.
Joc C May 2, 2013 at 09:30 pm
API of 800 is not bad but parents are comparing it with other schools in the district. There areRead More other issues that make parents unhappy. The residents in RWS and Belmont Shores are paying property tax which contributes to the building of RWSE. There is an expectation that their kids will go to the kids they help fund. The RWS parents are unhappy because they were told they would not be affected by the no boundary policy. Then, a year later 26 families are affected. No one like surprises. The board's decision to use a 'walking distance' algorithm to promote neighborhood schools is not working. Well, hypothetically if Nesbit API is over 900 and the other schools has API of 800, would we still have this discussion? We would not know for sure but something to think about if API is a factor among others.
Brannigan May 2, 2013 at 08:40 pm
I just moved into the neighborhood behind Iron Gate and we bought in Belmont because of the schools.Read More I am kinda shocked to find people bashing Nesbit. The API score is over 800, has great diversity, and the location seems to be pretty convenient. Our son has 2 more years before he starts, but we wouldn't mind one bit if we ended up at Nesbit. What's the difference of 100 points on API that an extra 5 minutes of father-son tutoring time can't fix. Besides, we all end up at Ralston and Carlmont anyways. To me, those are the schools that matter most.